RadPix Meeting

Europe/London
337 (Oliver Lodge Building)

337

Oliver Lodge Building

Description

This meeting will be face-to-face at the Oliver Lodge Building (map here) for those who can attend in-person. There will be a zoom connection for those who are remote.

    • 1
      RadPix brainstorming - Open questions
      • In-pixel digital readout (ie hit buffers) inside the pixel (like in RD50-MPW4) or at the periphery (like MightyPix/LF-MightyPix) - pros and cons of each configuration
      • LHCb requires 32-bit data words: RD50-MPW4 has 8-bit time-stamps, is this enough to achieve the required 3 ns time resolution? How many bits to address rows and columns in a 2 cm x 2 cm chip (RD50-MPW4 has 8-bit row address and 8-bit column address)
      • How many FIFOs in the periphery given the data rate anticipated in Mighty Tracker and UP, to avoid loosing hits
      • Pixel size will mostl likely be 100 um x 100 um, anticipate how this will benefit power consumption (distribute allowed power budget between pixel matrix and everything else)
      • Plan to develop and evaluate enclosed layout transistors
      • Voltage regulation
    • 2
      Lunch break
    • 3
      RadPix chip block diagram
      • Sketch block diagram, think of main specs for all the main blocks, and estimate what 'should' be included in RadPix1/can be realistically designed until the chip submission
    • 4
      RadPix submission plan
      • Anticipated timeline for submissions
      • What blocks are included in each submission
      • Who designs what block
      • Person power and submission funding
      • Design files sharing
    • 5
      Coffee break
      • Can also include a quick lab tour to show HV-CMOS experimental setups (RD50-MPW4, UKRI-MPW1 and MightyPix)
    • 6
      RadPix submission plan (continuation)
    • 7
      Progress since last in-person meeting
      • Summary of relevant measured results (RD50-MPW4, UKRI-MPW1 LFoundry prototypes)
      • Plans for TID evaluation at RAL in late October or November
      • We've never measured SEU tolerance
    • 8
      Anticipate DAQ
      • 'Standard' options are Caribou (used with RD50-MPW and UKRI-MPW), GECCO (MightyPix) and MARS (MightyPix)
      • Pros and cons of each option
      • What DAQ should we use to maximise the number of institutes contibuting to the evaluation programme?